Anyone to the left of Biden has been accused of being alt-right at some point. Donald Trump is apparently alt-right. Pewdiepie is apparently alt-right.
JonTron is apparently alt-right. It seems like the term 'alt-right' is purely a slanderous term meant to associate people with Adolf Hitler. But
when you actually research the alt-right in depth, it turns out that it is much more complex than that.
The alt-right is two things; an umbrella term, and a philosophy. It seeks to rebel against many influences, mainly the concept of 'modernity', which
is often linked to the Jewish community. Modernity is very complex, but the following traits can be attributed to it:
Individualism
Declining social and moral values
Secularism
Industrially/financially based society
The loss of the sovereignity of white countries (due to primarily immigration and Jewish control over core institutions)
The abandonment and rejection of traditional values
Feminism
The LGBTQ+ community
Egalitarianism
On the other hand, the alt-right wants to re-establish a society that is protective of it's culture, it's people, traditional values and social
cohesion. When I say 'traditional values', I refer to values and principles that were widely accepted throughout western civilization before modernity
but aren't anymore. Such values mainly include:
Collectivism
High social and moral values
Religiosity
A human and agriculturally based society
The complete control and sovereignity of white countries by white people
Traditional roles of women in families and society
Restrictions on homosexual and transgender activity
Part 2: Nations
To an alt-right person, nations are a key aspect of humanity. And a nation in this worldview is made up of blood and to a lesser extent, soil.
That is, the ethnicity of a nation and the territory in which they inhabit. Many Neo-conservatives like to believe that an ethnically Indian
person can be American if he believes in vague notions of liberty or equality, but to an alt-right person this is a severe deconstruction
of what a nation is. Historically people have evolved to live amongst their own ethnic groups, and thus prefer it over living among others.
When there are multiple different ethnic groups living in large amounts under the same country, they would be viewed in this framework as
different nations. This is why different races in multi-cultural society have been fighting each other and trying to screw each other over forever.
Non-white groups in white countries view themselves often in this manner, though the majority of whites have been subdued into thinking that this
worldview is wrong. Yet this is still a psychological factor in many instances (e.g the fact that white people are disproportionately unlikely
to have a relationship with non-white people).
Culture plays a big role into making a nation as well, but the alt-right views culture in a very different way then the general population.
Your culture is heavily influenced by blood and soil (would the Inuits have their culture if they were African?), and influences you much more
than most would give it credit for.
The Neo-conservative opinion that I mentioned earlier that an Indian could become American by agreeing with and practicing certain principles
and ideals is influenced by the modern conception of culture. In reality culture is an intrinsic and inherited part of humans that isn't based in
basic ideals. America isn't any different. Some would argue that America is "A nation built by immigrants" therefore this distinction doesn't apply
to America, but white immigrants primarily came from ethnic groups very similar to the Anglo-Saxons (mainly Celts and Germans), which isn't
historically unique. Indeed this is more complicated with groups like Italian-Americans but they are generally considered as being ethnically
and culturally non-American.
Part 3: Race
A very integral aspect of the alt-right is it's views on race, often described as race realism, which is basically the idea that race isn't
just a social construct or a different skin tone, but various biological and psychological distinctions. Race Realists typically view white people
as being superior, though often Asian people are placed around or in the same area as whites. They also typically view Africans and Aborigines as
being the most inferior races. This is generally due to proven biological/psychological differences between races, as well as associations with
antisocial behaviors among perceived inferior races.
Part 4: Sex/gender
The alt-right affirms the traditional roles of men and women in society, and has somewhat of a 'sex realism', though most alt-right people wouldn't
say that they view women in the same way that they view blacks. Women are viewed by the alt-right as being mothers and home-makers rather than
workers, whereas men are viewed as providers and people who build and maintain society. This has generally been the role of the sexes everywhere
until the rise of Feminism, and Feminism was arguably the first social justice movement so the alt-right is firmly opposed to it.
Part 5: Jews
The opinions on how society should handle Jews vary at large among the alt-right, but everyone agrees that the Jewish community is generally
responsible for modernity and that Jews shouldn't be allowed to participate in the Government or any major institution in a Gentile country.
The alt-right opinion on Jews ties in to the alt-right conception of nations, since because Jews were expelled from Israel by the Romans in 49 AD
they have been a group of nomadic peoples (Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahim and Ethiopian) who's home is everywhere yet nowhere, thus they don't
have a nation of their own (except for modern day Israel, but this is a recent invention and long before that was created this nomadicism had
been baked into the Jewish identity, which is possibly why Israel is one of the most secular countries on the planet). But of course like any
other ethnic group they act in their own interests, which combined with the Jewish religious and cultural hostility towards Gentiles results in
Jews always being at odds with the nations they inhabit.
Furthermore, due to the fact that Jews don't really have any particular nation to call home and since Judaism doesn't really belong to any particular
ethnic group (besides the 4 ethnic groups I mentioned earlier, people can convert to Judaism), Jewish people are fundamentally rootless as peoples.
Judaism is fundamentally a mental concept with enough of a vague tie to ethnicity that they form their own nations, hence why it is often Jews
that create/propagate/implement modernistic ideologies detached from the notions of ethnicity, such as Marxism (Karl Marx was Jewish, Engels was
Jewish, the Rothschilds who backed them were Jewish, and the majority of Bolsheviks were Jewish) and Libertarianism (Ayn Rand was Jewish).
Part 6: Who is alt-right?
The short answer is that many different people are alt-right, the only continuity they have is in sharing the general principles outlined thus far.
The main ideologies held by alt-right people are:
National Socialism/Fascism (obviously)
Nationalism
Monarchism/Feudalism
Kaczynskism
Anarcho-Capitalism (sometimes, not really)
It is worth noting thought that just because an ideology was listed there doesn't mean that that ideology as a whole is alt-right, just that people
who are alt-right may be of that ideology.
To an alt-right person, nations are a key aspect of humanity. And a nation in this worldview is made up of blood and to a lesser extent, soil.
That is, the ethnicity of a nation and the territory in which they inhabit. Many Neo-conservatives like to believe that an ethnically Indian
person can be American if he believes in vague notions of liberty or equality, but to an alt-right person this is a severe deconstruction
of what a nation is. Historically people have evolved to live amongst their own ethnic groups, and thus prefer it over living among others.
When there are multiple different ethnic groups living in large amounts under the same country, they would be viewed in this framework as
different nations. This is why different races in multi-cultural society have been fighting each other and trying to screw each other over forever.
Non-white groups in white countries view themselves often in this manner, though the majority of whites have been subdued into thinking that this
worldview is wrong. Yet this is still a psychological factor in many instances (e.g the fact that white people are disproportionately unlikely
to have a relationship with non-white people).
Culture plays a big role into making a nation as well, but the alt-right views culture in a very different way then the general population.
Your culture is heavily influenced by blood and soil (would the Inuits have their culture if they were African?), and influences you much more
than most would give it credit for.
The Neo-conservative opinion that I mentioned earlier that an Indian could become American by agreeing with and practicing certain principles
and ideals is influenced by the modern conception of culture. In reality culture is an intrinsic and inherited part of humans that isn't based in
basic ideals. America isn't any different. Some would argue that America is "A nation built by immigrants" therefore this distinction doesn't apply
to America, but white immigrants primarily came from ethnic groups very similar to the Anglo-Saxons (mainly Celts and Germans), which isn't
historically unique. Indeed this is more complicated with groups like Italian-Americans but they are generally considered as being ethnically
and culturally non-American.
